I critiqued Chelsea. I think her opening was good. She remembered to shake Courtney's hand and introduce herself. I also think it was good that she smiled the whole time. Her speech had some really good ideas in it, except the ideas lacked details. She forgot to state what her strengths are. She also could have elaborated on her previous experiences in the field of fashion. I didn't think there was anything included in the speech to really make the person want to choose her over any other candidate for the job. You can tell she was extremely nervous and her voice wasn't as conversational as it usually is because of that. She was stumbling over the words a little bit and used um a lot. I think if she stopped took a deep breathe and started over that may have helped her push through.
I am critiquing Courtney’s impromptu speech. She started off very well by introducing herself to the principal. I also found her praise of him very interesting and complementary. All her reasons for her being eligible for the teaching job were organized very well and had great detail. It would have been better if when she said she would be a good addition to their faculty if she gave a reason why she would be. Also when she was talking it seemed really rehearsed and not very conversational. She just needs to loosen up so she can have a normal conversation but overall it was well organized and well thought out.
I critiqued AnnMarie i belive that she tryed to memorize her speech rather then go out their and have a conversation. She had a hard time knowing what to say. In a way she seemed a little clueless. She usent her unemployment as an excuse to why she should be put into a class that is full. Like Professor Mcmanimon said the teacher doesnt know her so she honestly doesnt care about her personal life. She needed to express more of what she would bring to the class if aloud in. Pretty much she needs to do more sucking up towards the professor she is trying to convince.
I'm not sure if we were suppose to critique ourselves or another student, so I will just be critiquing myself. I remembered to shake the others persons hand which was good but I kept repeating client and putting that word in places that did not make sense. all in all I think I did an okay job. My posture was straight, again I was talking with my hands which I have to calm down. But I did remember to stand in one spot instead of moving around. As stated before, I did an okay job.
I critiqued Josh’s impromptu speech. His opening was good the way he introduced himself to the Chief of Police. During his conversation his body language and eye contact with his partner was great. One thing he did not do was praise the Chief. In his speech, he should have not mentioned that he was working for a construction company. That was not need information for the Chief to know. He just has to be conscious when speaking not to use “ums.” Overall he did a great job with this speech.
I'm assuming that we are critiquing our partner's speech so I am critiquing Ja'lynn's speech. She started out nice by recognizing me and introducing herself. She established what it was that she wanted me to know. She also used praise and shook my hand. She didn't ramble on. She took breaks to let me respond. Ja'lynn had a very conversational tone, and she smiled a lot. I think there was only one negative part to her speech. She was praising me for going to a certain school, but then later was talking about a different school so that made her credibility go down a little. Overall, she did a very good job and if it were a real life situation I would definitely consider her for the job.
I partnered up with Dean who I assume I am critiquing. I believe this speech was Dean's finest moment as it allowed him to flow smoothly and really exemplify his conversational style of speaking. He had in some very good detail and he spoke highly of himself by giving examples of his hard work. He did say that the captain ran a good ship, but maybe a little bit more appraisal to lower the defenses of someone he would be asking a job from. The introduction was smooth and the closing was appropriate.
For my impromptu speech i partnered up with Karen. I think this speech was probably her best. She definetely wasn't as nervous and she seemed more comfortable with providing all the information that she needed. She made her speech sound like an actual conversation, which made everything flow smoothly. Karen did a good job at making it clear what she wanted and why she would be good for the job. She mentioned how someone else at her work told her that their was a job opening for a higher postion at the store she was working at and she mentioned how long she's been working there overall and how she had once filled the job temporarily so she already knows what it's about. The only thing I would suggest is that she needed to give a little bit more time for her partner to respond to make it seem a little bit more real and a little bit more spontaneous to the audience.
I am critiquing Danielle. I think she did a wonderful job on this speech. She was calm amd collected and did not seem nervous at all. I like how she brought in informantion about the school that she wanted to work at and also about herself. She used good facts about herself such as where she graduated from and what her GPA was when she graduated. She made great eye contact and also allowed time for me to respond when she asked me questions. Great job!
I am critiqueing Joshes speech. His speech was over all good because he showed he was really interested by the way he was talking. There were a few things he could have changed though, first he could have said what he would have done to help if the chief highered him. Also he could have praised the cheif, and he needed more details. Overall though he did a good job because I could tell he really liked what he was talking about.
I am critiquing Erin's speech. She gave great praise at the beginning which flowed nicely into her taking about the job she wanted. I felt as though she was not very conversational and it came out a little bit too rehearsed. But I feel the more she performs the impromptu speech and gets more comfortable it will run smoother. She also did not let the person she was talking to get a word in she just said everything she needed to and got it over with. One thing she did really well was back everything up with details which made her sound a lot more confident.
I'm assuming that I am critiqueing Joe he was strong with his speaking he really got his point across. He talked up the lady and then gave his experiences he knew what he was talkign about. He was well prepared and ready to get that job. He could move around a little less but other than that he was good he did good on his speech.
I am a doctoral student at the University of Pennsylvania expanding my expertise in communication media. My doctoral studies focus is communication media and instructional technology in our society and the current expansion with mediated communication, cyberspace and web 2.0 technologies in politics.
12 comments:
I critiqued Chelsea. I think her opening was good. She remembered to shake Courtney's hand and introduce herself. I also think it was good that she smiled the whole time. Her speech had some really good ideas in it, except the ideas lacked details. She forgot to state what her strengths are. She also could have elaborated on her previous experiences in the field of fashion. I didn't think there was anything included in the speech to really make the person want to choose her over any other candidate for the job. You can tell she was extremely nervous and her voice wasn't as conversational as it usually is because of that. She was stumbling over the words a little bit and used um a lot. I think if she stopped took a deep breathe and started over that may have helped her push through.
I am critiquing Courtney’s impromptu speech. She started off very well by introducing herself to the principal. I also found her praise of him very interesting and complementary. All her reasons for her being eligible for the teaching job were organized very well and had great detail. It would have been better if when she said she would be a good addition to their faculty if she gave a reason why she would be. Also when she was talking it seemed really rehearsed and not very conversational. She just needs to loosen up so she can have a normal conversation but overall it was well organized and well thought out.
I critiqued AnnMarie i belive that she tryed to memorize her speech rather then go out their and have a conversation. She had a hard time knowing what to say. In a way she seemed a little clueless. She usent her unemployment as an excuse to why she should be put into a class that is full. Like Professor Mcmanimon said the teacher doesnt know her so she honestly doesnt care about her personal life. She needed to express more of what she would bring to the class if aloud in. Pretty much she needs to do more sucking up towards the professor she is trying to convince.
I'm not sure if we were suppose to critique ourselves or another student, so I will just be critiquing myself. I remembered to shake the others persons hand which was good but I kept repeating client and putting that word in places that did not make sense. all in all I think I did an okay job. My posture was straight, again I was talking with my hands which I have to calm down. But I did remember to stand in one spot instead of moving around. As stated before, I did an okay job.
I critiqued Josh’s impromptu speech. His opening was good the way he introduced himself to the Chief of Police. During his conversation his body language and eye contact with his partner was great. One thing he did not do was praise the Chief. In his speech, he should have not mentioned that he was working for a construction company. That was not need information for the Chief to know. He just has to be conscious when speaking not to use “ums.” Overall he did a great job with this speech.
I'm assuming that we are critiquing our partner's speech so I am critiquing Ja'lynn's speech. She started out nice by recognizing me and introducing herself. She established what it was that she wanted me to know. She also used praise and shook my hand. She didn't ramble on. She took breaks to let me respond. Ja'lynn had a very conversational tone, and she smiled a lot. I think there was only one negative part to her speech. She was praising me for going to a certain school, but then later was talking about a different school so that made her credibility go down a little. Overall, she did a very good job and if it were a real life situation I would definitely consider her for the job.
I partnered up with Dean who I assume I am critiquing. I believe this speech was Dean's finest moment as it allowed him to flow smoothly and really exemplify his conversational style of speaking. He had in some very good detail and he spoke highly of himself by giving examples of his hard work. He did say that the captain ran a good ship, but maybe a little bit more appraisal to lower the defenses of someone he would be asking a job from. The introduction was smooth and the closing was appropriate.
For my impromptu speech i partnered up with Karen. I think this speech was probably her best. She definetely wasn't as nervous and she seemed more comfortable with providing all the information that she needed. She made her speech sound like an actual conversation, which made everything flow smoothly. Karen did a good job at making it clear what she wanted and why she would be good for the job. She mentioned how someone else at her work told her that their was a job opening for a higher postion at the store she was working at and she mentioned how long she's been working there overall and how she had once filled the job temporarily so she already knows what it's about. The only thing I would suggest is that she needed to give a little bit more time for her partner to respond to make it seem a little bit more real and a little bit more spontaneous to the audience.
I am critiquing Danielle. I think she did a wonderful job on this speech. She was calm amd collected and did not seem nervous at all. I like how she brought in informantion about the school that she wanted to work at and also about herself. She used good facts about herself such as where she graduated from and what her GPA was when she graduated. She made great eye contact and also allowed time for me to respond when she asked me questions. Great job!
I am critiqueing Joshes speech. His speech was over all good because he showed he was really interested by the way he was talking. There were a few things he could have changed though, first he could have said what he would have done to help if the chief highered him. Also he could have praised the cheif, and he needed more details. Overall though he did a good job because I could tell he really liked what he was talking about.
I am critiquing Erin's speech. She gave great praise at the beginning which flowed nicely into her taking about the job she wanted. I felt as though she was not very conversational and it came out a little bit too rehearsed. But I feel the more she performs the impromptu speech and gets more comfortable it will run smoother. She also did not let the person she was talking to get a word in she just said everything she needed to and got it over with. One thing she did really well was back everything up with details which made her sound a lot more confident.
I'm assuming that I am critiqueing Joe he was strong with his speaking he really got his point across. He talked up the lady and then gave his experiences he knew what he was talkign about. He was well prepared and ready to get that job. He could move around a little less but other than that he was good he did good on his speech.
Post a Comment